Traduction et analyse de mots par intelligence artificielle ChatGPT
Sur cette page, vous pouvez obtenir une analyse détaillée d'un mot ou d'une phrase, réalisée à l'aide de la meilleure technologie d'intelligence artificielle à ce jour:
- comment le mot est utilisé
- fréquence d'utilisation
- il est utilisé plus souvent dans le discours oral ou écrit
- options de traduction de mots
- exemples d'utilisation (plusieurs phrases avec traduction)
- étymologie
oath of allegiance - traduction vers néerlandais
![[[Benedict Arnold]]'s Oath of Allegiance, May 30, 1778](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Benedict Arnold oath of allegiance.jpg?width=200 "[[Benedict Arnold]]'s Oath of Allegiance, May 30, 1778")
![The Greek physician [[Hippocrates]] (460–370 BC), to whom the oath is traditionally attributed](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Hippocrates.jpg?width=200 "The Greek physician [[Hippocrates]] (460–370 BC), to whom the oath is traditionally attributed")
![Greek]] manuscript of the oath](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/HippocraticOath.jpg?width=200 "Greek]] manuscript of the oath")
![Papyrus Oxyrhynchus]] 2547.](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Papyrus text; fragment of Hippocratic oath. Wellcome L0034090.jpg?width=200 "Papyrus Oxyrhynchus]] 2547.")
![charge]] on the [[coat of arms]] of [[Anjala]], [[Finland]].](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Anjala.vaakuna.svg?width=200 "charge]] on the [[coat of arms]] of [[Anjala]], [[Finland]].")
![cantons]], declaring unity and freedom in eternal alliance](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Johann Heinrich Füssli 018.jpg?width=200 "cantons]], declaring unity and freedom in eternal alliance")
!["[[Tennis Court Oath]]" by [[Jacques-Louis David]].](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Le Serment du Jeu de paume.jpg?width=200 "\"[[Tennis Court Oath]]\" by [[Jacques-Louis David]].")
Définition
Wikipédia
An oath of allegiance is an oath whereby a subject or citizen acknowledges a duty of allegiance and swears loyalty to a monarch or a country. In modern republics, oaths are sworn to the country in general, or to the country's constitution. For example, officials in the United States, take an oath of office that includes swearing allegiance to the United States Constitution. However, typically in a constitutional monarchy, such as in the United Kingdom, Australia and other Commonwealth realms, oaths are sworn to the monarch. Armed forces typically require a military oath.
In feudal times, a person would also swear allegiance to his feudal superiors. To this day the oath sworn by freemen of the City of London contains an oath of obedience to the Lord Mayor of the City of London.
Oaths of allegiance are commonly required of newly naturalized citizens (see Oath of Citizenship), members of the armed forces, and those assuming public (particularly parliamentary and judicial) offices. Clergy in the Church of England are required to take an Oath of Supremacy acknowledging the authority of the British monarch.
A typical example of an oath of allegiance is that sworn by Members of Parliament in the Netherlands:
I swear (affirm) allegiance to the King, to the Charter for the Kingdom of the Netherlands, and to the Constitution. I swear (affirm) that I will faithfully perform the duties my office lays upon me. So help me God almighty! (This I declare and affirm)
In many Commonwealth realms, all that is required is an oath to the monarch, and not the constitution or state. There have been moves in some of the realms to make the oath of citizenship sworn by new citizens refer to the country rather than the monarch. However, the oaths sworn by judges, members of parliament, etc., have not been changed. All of these moves have not succeeded as the King (or Queen if is female) is the personification of the Canadian, British, or Australian state (or that of any other Commonwealth realm). Allegiance sworn to the monarch is the same as to the country, its constitution or flag. The European Court of Human Rights ruled in 1999 that the oath of allegiance to a reigning monarch is "reasonably viewed as an affirmation of loyalty to the constitutional principles supporting the workings of representative democracy."
